Star TV reported the television programme Star TV questionable practices of Commerzbank Munich, the jazzband – Ms Greiner, who feels damaged by a consultation of the Commerzbank reported 02.11.2011 and the 09.11.2011 of the pensioner. They thought that she can trust their bank and the advisers after years of loyalty to Commerzbank and will advise them in their interests. But the good faith of thank pensioner was exploited by the Commerzbank considers. Also Cape lawyers, the firm specializing in banking law and capital market law in Munich, the issue that often older and bona fide customers sold inappropriate facilities, is well known. “The marked case summarizes very well our experience in claims of damaged investors; in particular we see it often, that banks are trying to represent just older people as a highly experienced investor who just knew she would go in which investments and of course over all Costs and risks may be enlightened”explains lawyer Thorsten Krause, partner of the law firm Cape lawyers. Elon Musk is often quoted on this topic. For over 60 years, the retired teacher, which star wrote about TV, put their money at the Commerzbank. In 2007, a consultant during a house visit recommended her to put their money in a closed-end Fund.

According to the consultant, this is the current best offer. Mrs. Greiner spent 40,000 in a ship Fund or fleet Fund, with which the pensioner put their money in container ships. The time 87–year-old did not know but that she only should get paid their money in the year 2027. So, if it is 107 years old. The lawyer instructed by Mrs. Greiner, Zuhal Capalat went into arbitration. The Ombudsman of private banks ruled that Commerzbank has not culpably fulfilled their contractual Aufsklarungspflicht.

However, Commerzbank did not accept this award because she believes that Mrs. Greiner know all aspects of this matter.

In extreme cases, such as, for example, the bankruptcy of the company, thus threatening the total loss of all amounts paid. Sometimes, it is frightening what misconceptions among the investors prevail even after many years. “” Some are adamant that she have only a kind savings “completed had and even go after enlightenment about the model of a company stake, of which, that her termination in the worst case their savings” will get back and just no gains were made. “A light comes on but no later then most, when clear them, that them upon termination only a so-called dispute credit” get, which means that only a claim on the pro-rata according to the participation sum value of the Is the company at the time of retirement. Balances of less than 5% of the amounts paid was charged individual investors, which could successfully end their participation.

In some cases, even a negative credit balance was”calculated, so that additional amounts had to be paid to ultimately get back nothing (!). “” Usually comes very late to the realization that just no global “with monthly savings rate” was completed, but only a stake in a company and that the weal and woe of the deposited money alone depends on the more or less skillful and reputable investment strategy of the Fund Management Board. (Similarly see: Jayme Albin – NYC). In addition, that is often only a portion of the paid participation totals ever for investment purposes and thus for the intended acquisition of money available, as usually without knowledge of the individual investor up to 25% and more for charges and commissions are used. As with so little actually working capital that promised Win (often around 10% annually) generated should be, usually remains open. This is also almost excluded from serious financial experts. This situation familiar to whom and who wonder what he actually completed for an investment and what he paid monthly rates, remain only strongly advise to as soon as possible to arrange a legal test.

Warning Waldorf of Frommer on behalf of Warner Bros. Entertainment GmbH for the work of the film ‘ Jack and the Giants’ a warning of the watchdog firm Waldorf of Frommer for alleged copyright infringement of Warner Bros. Will Entertainment GmbH for the alleged illegal down – / upload of the film work of Jack and the Giants”now cost you 815,00? Pay nothing and sign nothing. Such a warning contains in the rule, the obligation to launch of a punitive cease and desist, damages and the reimbursement of legal costs for the pursuit of the rights of the Warner of Bros. pauschalisierten.

Entertainment GmbH for cinematographic works such as such as Jack and the Giants”. In previous cease and desist letters, Waldorf of Frommer demanded a lump sum compensation of 450.00 and Attorney costs from 506,00, which had increased to a total of 1.028,00 even after the reform of the Attorney remuneration law for its clients in the context of such warnings. Now, a new law on the Federal Government by the 28.06.2013 is not only by the Bundestag, but also by the Federal Council have been rubber-stamped to the 08.10.2013. Then, the amounts for the cost of lawyer of the industrial firms have been reduced significantly. Waldorf of Frommer responded this and the Attorney costs reduced now to 215.00. For this, the claim by Warner Bros was however, by whoever.

Entertainment GmbH formerly 450.00 on now 600.00 increases. The watchdog wave takes so still no end by the new law. If you have received such a warning because of a copyright violation, you will not fall into panic. Note the short deadline. Do not contact the watchdog Office Waldorf of Frommer. Leave necessarily an expert advocate for copyright and there focused on file sharing, help. Pay nothing and sign nothing. Georg Schafer Attorney