Economic Development

Poverty does not substantiate a need for urgency in the early stages of economic development. It is not an urgency that can be solved, its solution depends on the growth and appears once it underpins. The new global economy begins to turn into a bull on three areas: macroeconomics of money, credit and interests. Conquer the world a new love of riches, Peter Drucker cites the first minis TRO Communist China, which in 1985 said: to become rich is beautiful. Because it is a universal truth that prosperity is service, commercial activity is the benefactor, and the investigations of the clergy and the intellectual progressive left in the barn dislikes. With all these wonders of modernity, where, since the phones, Palm and Notebook, becomes doubtful the existence of so many poor, economists have been refreshing water, dew of dawn, the poppies of the chimera. His work has been and is to delineate the limits of action and print the terror of the per-eases. That is why his work has also been moral. The economy, beyond being a displine with scientific pretensions, has functioned as moral assurance and new-va philosophy as possible.

Nations have become a study hall of the economy. In a civilization like ours in which the only goods that appear as such, for most men, are economic goods, how do you combat the scourge of poverty? The economic dynamism allows material goods produced in abundance, to work without difficulty, in the fulfillment of human destiny common to all men. Part of this solution, this dynamic is given by the superintendent, not the man to fall into civil society as an entity of the third sector groupings nonprofit that increasingly are being formed as solid solutions to human problems in the world order, with a view of the common destiny: the comprehensive care of families. Hence, we should develop an economic-centered moral happiness of man, like the immortal moral commands us to develop all our values of being, but different from the moral force almost entirely negative economic since conviction or suspicion of the spiritual and resorts in almost exclusively, to material, calling the possessions of prosaic life of the existence. Material resources will then, if they become human goods, which will serve as a pedestal or a springboard for the development of our human nature. Nelson Astegher words: poverty, Latin America, morals, order, global modernity, cell-ing, notebook, need, economics, global, work. Abstract Governments have an explanation for the existence of the homeless.

If the GDP increases are less poor. According to the index, when the investment increases more work, although he has not. According to the government the proper administration of wage flexibility, helps to increase the supply of labor and thus be a palliative against poverty. Companies should have freedom of movement, but not people, because their rights are secondary, anecdotal. Low inflation “creates poverty? Governments say that salvation for submerged classes is low inflation, because workers are afraid to demand more pay and benefits. This is not proven. That is why his work has also been moral. In a civilization like ours in which the only goods that appear as such, are the real economic, How do you fight the scourge of poverty? The economic dynamism allows material goods produced in abundance, to work without much difficulty in the fulfillment of human destiny common to all men.


They expected many changes, but: What was happening with the economy in Argentina? Let’s see: The first thing to say at this point is that inflationary problems were attacked at any time (Or anyone heard any statement about it?), And that is why the same escalated and it seems they are now gaining dynamism. As an example of this, simply observe what is happening with the negotiations salary: many unionized today are demanding increases of over 30%, while others who had already agreed earlier this year increased nearly 20%, now seek a further increase driven by the effects of inflation (teachers unions Province Buenos Aires, who had made three months ago a 24% wage increase, a further increase in demand now.) Many claimed that the new government was to curb public spending, but none of this has been happening and it is growing at around 40% yoy. Nor could do a lot on energy, this problem is compounded by the low temperatures now to put more pressure on aggregate supply, and torn by conflict from the field and the disincentive to productive investment. Thus, the inflation problem has worsened and is pressing the government to spend more money on subsidies to prevent the situation from larger purchases. The grants, this big ball of garbage under the rug that there is no way hide, threaten to become unsustainable … What will happen when the government decides to remove them, at least partially? How long can increase subsidies to avoid price hikes? Of the nearly six months of the new government, honestly have not seen that done too.