Currently, we live decurrent social and productive transformations, especially, of the advances of science and the technology that the service of the man places considered resources and possibilities until then utopian and that they demand of the people academic formation and abilities for new abilities. The work market became more competitive, demanding each time more the instrumental knowledge and the act of contract of dynamic people, who demonstrate adaptation capacity to the varied situations. In this context, the necessary manager to have a series of individual and professional qualities to accept the requirements of the organizations in the search for satisfactory results and the formation of a team solid, capable to take care of the objectives considered for the institution. He is not enough that it fulfills the stated periods and transmits to its subordinate the strategies for the development of the works. More than what this, is necessary that it assumes the responsibilities, demonstrates comprometimento, either democratic, has one optimistical vision, aiming at the valuation and the progress in that they compose the group, since it is the reference for led its and its position and attitude influence in the behavior of excessively. A leader manager establishes a dialogue relation and confidence with the team, makes of the people its partners, stimulates and allows that all are felt competent to carry through the activities successfully proposals, therefore the motivation of the group is one of the determinative factors in this process and, the people alone execute with satisfaction an action when they see a reason for this. In accordance with vision Cavalcanti the Landmark in interview granted to the program ' ' Filosfico' coffee; ' of the TV Culture, the manager must understand the reality of sistmica form, more complex, it must be skillful to think all, in order to make the joints between the different ones to know, valuing the creativity of the professionals and its diverse manifestations and conceptions of world.
We consider that the revision of the management and the estimated ones, proposal for Sacristn, is part of the revision of the organizacional culture: values, beliefs, premises, of the educational establishments. To admit not the participation, or exemption, of the family on the routes of the formation of the pupil, or to move away it, when manifest interest in sharing is one of the attitudes that they could be moved. The collective work and interaction with the family are sufficiently difficult, if not impossible, to deal with education without touching, of some form, in questions related to the familiar structure. Independent of the vision that if has of the family: controverted, idolatrada, confused, denied, it are determinative, although not to be exclusive, in the construction of the emotional, psychic and intellectual structure of the individuals. On the other hand, the organization and the functioning of the family are influenced by the partner-politician-economic conjuncture. Without menosprezar and privileging the influences of the family on the conditions of the pupil, Sacristn (1999) considered that familiar the pertaining to school education cannot supply dficits. In function of this, it defended the importance of the joint between the family and the school for the pupil a time that: ‘ ‘ The discontinuity between family and school is source of conflicts for the son-student, to to compel it to pass it for constant processes of transistion between ecological ways with norms diferenciadas’ ‘.
(SACRISTN, 1999, P. 219). Some schools and professors believe that they can divide its responsibilities with the parents. It also has many parents who if premake use to make it and creem that the mutual aid is important. These parents add to the domestic tasks and the jobs the task to participate of the construction of a school that takes care of to the real necessities of its children.